Posted by: secretperson | May 15, 2008

Religion in Schools

A group of MPs wants religious education in schools to be optional.

They also mention that the compulsory ‘act of collective worship’ should be optional for under 16s as it currently is for sixth-formers. I believe the parents can pull their kids out of this at the moment. The phrase of choice for the report was children of “sufficient maturity, intelligence and understanding”. Does that have a legal definition? Who is to judge?

I believe the committee are wrong to make RE optional. RE should be education about religion, not supporting one religion. If there is something offensive being taught it is the lessons that should be changed, not opted out of. The study of religion has as much right as any other study to be chosen by a school as a compulsory class. Many children might claim religious justification simply to miss a lesson. Surely learning about other religions is esential to ‘promote understanding between faiths’ or ‘encourage community cohesion’ or whatever phrase is fashionable amongst politicians at the moment.

On the other hand the ‘act of collective worship’ should not be made optional, it should be scrapped. The idea that all state schools, of which two thirds are non-religious, should be forced to make their pupils pray or sing hymns is ridiculous. Although it is not faith specific, it in effect tries to make all non-aligned schools into Church of England. Collective worship is for churches or mosques or synagogues, not for schools which should be educating children, not converting them.

So in conclusion, one proposal is completely wrong, and one doesn’t go far enough.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Yeah. 1 hours RE a week should be it.

    I’m dead against religious schools though – can’t think of anything else so divisive at such a young age. Ban em. Ban em all.

    Time we took this BS out of the classroom.

    A complete moratorium on the building of new religious buildings and disestablishment of the CofE would work wonders too.

  2. Yeah I think I favour disestablishment. Despite the history I don’t think the government should officially favour one religion. But I am an atheist…

    Also though, I think it is important to recognise our CofE heritage and what that has brought to the country historically. Our separation from Rome has influenced so much of our development as a nation. We should stop ‘acts of collective worship’ but very much learn about the history.

    I don’t think though it is government’s place to intefere with religious schools or local planning laws. Private schools can chioose religion if they want, and planning should be locally decided.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: